Interval Cardio Training

I’ve been reading off and on about interval training which, in short, is cardio training with short intervals of intense effort. I was browsing through some magazines at Barnes & Noble and a recent mention in Men’s [Health | Fitness] reinterested me in the technique. I checked online for some more information and found some useful articles at iVillage.

From what I've read, interval training can burn more calories in less time than traditional cardio. And the article “Invigorate with Interval Training” at iVillage has a good overview. As a starting point, they define exertion on a 1-10 scale with 1 being “very easy” and 10 being “very difficult”; and, they offer various interval training suggestions depending on your current fitness level:

  • For beginners, they recommend a 1:3 ratio of interval (at exertion 4-5) to recovery (at exertion 2-3). So, after a warm at low-middle effort for 5 minutes, you could go to a half-full effort for 2 minutes, return to low-middle effort for 6 minutes, and then repeat with the interval.

  • And, for intermediate fitness, they recommend a 1:1 radio of interval (at 4-6 exertion) to recovery (at 2-3 exertion). This one does have the advantage of being the easiest to keep track of times ;).

  • Then, for conditioned folks, their recommendation goes back to a 1:3 interval-to-recovery ratio, but with an interval intensity around 7-10. They point out that these intervals are called “anaerobic, because they are more like sprints and can't be sustained for a great amount of time on the aerobic energy system”.

Much of their examples focus on treadmills, but they add that easily adaptable to other machines such as exercise bikes and elliptical machines. I’ve been aware of interval training intuitively for some time, but I haven’t known the particulars on ratios and exertion. And, as I’ve only heard good things about this technique, I look forward to giving it a try next time I go to the gym.

Walking May Not Be Enough

A British study has found that walking may not be enough to lower the risk of heart disease:

The study of 1975 men aged 49 to 64 from Caerphilly in south Wales found that while vigorous exercise reduced the risk of developing heart disease, light exercise made little difference.

[…]

“We do know that longer and more intense exercise produces the benefits,” he said. However, “the most important thing is that (people) exercise regularly, and they do exercise that they enjoy, and that they keep going long term”.

I also enjoyed this IC Wales write-up about the study:

Rather than taking brisk walks, sailing, bowling or playing golf, the man who wants to keep his heart healthy must begin taking part in activities such as hiking, jogging, swimming, tennis, squash or heavy digging.

Heavy digging? I can’t imagine anyone who’d embark on heavy lifting as part of an exercise regimen ;).

Weight Training May Reduce Heart Disease

According to a new study of 44,000 men, weight training may reduce heart disease:

Harvard University researchers studied more than 44,000 men who participated in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and looked at the role different types of exercise played on heart disease risk.

Not surprisingly, aerobic exercises like running and rowing were shown to be beneficial for reducing risk. But one of the biggest surprises was the effect of weight training. Those who lifted weights for 30 minutes or more a week had a risk reduction of 23 percent. [&hellip]

I can’t say that I’m terribly surprised, but I’m pleased to hear that.