Ebert (and Roeper) Liked Daredevil

I watched Ebert & Roeper this evening (as I do every week) and this week’s show featured a review of Daredevil. Considering Affleck’s recently lame track record (though not lame altogether), I didn’t have my hopes up. But, the duo rather liked it:

The movie is actually pretty good. Affleck and Garner probe for the believable corners of their characters, do not overact, are given semi-particular dialogue, and are in a very good-looking movie. Most of the tension takes place between the characters, not the props. There is, of course, a fancy formal ball to which everyone is invited (Commissioner Gordon must have been at the rival affair across town). […]

During the show’s segment on Daredevil in particular, they compared Daredevil to some of the darker comic book adaptations such as the first two Batman movies (and in contrast to the happier existence of Spider-Man).

And, I see that as a good sign since Spider-Man (and X-Men) were less than I had hoped for. Perhaps their PG-13 ratings were too restrictive, but maybe that’s not the case with Daredevil.

VHS – EOL?

From the Dallas Movie Geeks mailing list, USA Today reports that VHS may be coming to an end:

As a new generation of consumers is lured to the digital format by games and other interactive features, some Hollywood studios are gearing up for the death knell of the VHS cassette. They want to avoid the fate that befell the record industry in the early 1980s, when one popular mail-order house reportedly dumped 2 million eight-track tapes in a landfill because the market had evaporated almost overnight. […]

MGM Home Entertainment has slashed its VHS library, which at one point numbered 1,800 films, to 200. “We didn't want to have a lot of inventory in the marketplace when the bottom dropped out,” says David Bishop, president and chief operating officer. […]

I never collected much in the way of VHS tapes in the first place, though I enjoy buying some movies on DVD. These days, I try to avoid VHS entirely (much of it isn't widescren, for one thing).

When I was back in Pittsburgh over Christmas, my family went to Giant Eagle (a local supermarket chain) to rent some movies. Pittsburgh isn’t exactly a city of early-adopters, but there was still a sizable DVD section there. I suppose I'll have to convince my parents to buy a DVD player someday ;).

Igby Goes Down

I watched Igby Goes Down last night, but I didn’t enjoy it all that much. Over the years, I’e seen some lists of black comedies and I had liked some of the movies on the list, so I concluded that I liked “black comedies”. But, as I see more and more movies in this genre, I think I may have been mistaken in that original assessment (I didn't even like Brazil all that much, sorry).

MetaCritic gave it a 72, so maybe it’s just me. Interestingly enough, both the Los Angeles Times and San Francisco Chronicle describe the movie as striving for archness. I didn’t know what that word meant, either, until about a minute ago, but I can say that I now agree with that sentiment. It’s as if the movie is making an effort to stay just this side of being a parody.

The movie wasn’t horrible and I did enjoy a few scenes here and there. In particular, the “Baltimore” scene was rather humorous :).

gnod — self-learning ‘like’ system

I heard about Gnod through a post on Slashdot from a story on discovering new music. You tell it some of your favorite bands (or favorite books, or favorite movies), it asks you some questions, and then recommends some new bands (or books, or whatever).

Gnod is a self-adapting system that learns about the outer world by asking its visitors what they like and what they don't like. In this instance of gnod all is about music. Gnod is kind of a search engine for music you don't know about. It will ask you what music you like and then think about what you might like too. When I set gnod online its database was completely empty. Now it contains thousands of bands and quite some knowledge about who likes what. […]

I entered a few obscure band names (well, highly successful in the metal scene, but not something you’d ever hear on the radio), and its picks were surprisingly accurate (it picked Iced Earth, Dark Tranquillity, and a few I hadn’t yet heard, for those wondering).

Star Trek: Nemesis

I watched Star Trek: Nemesis this evening and largely enjoyed it. MetaCritic gave it just a 47 (out of 100), so I was a bit concerned. But it turned out all right.

I enjoyed it more than Insurrection, though I haven’t yet decided how it compares to First Contact. Nemesis was directed by Stuart Baird and, if you look at his history explains much of the film’s feel. Baird edited Tomb Raider, Mission Impossible 2, and Lethal Weapon 2. As a friend of mine remarked, “The scene where they’re racing around in a dune buggy, that wasn’t very TNG-like.”

Still, its action sequences are some of its strongest points (and I say that as a good thing). The last third of the film was especially quite a ride. And for you visual-effects buffs, I was quite impressed with some of the particle effects in particular. (Particle effects of what? The answer is in the Spoilers section below.)

Spoilers follow. If you haven’t seen the movie yet, you may not want to read further.

The ending was a bit of a waste. It was very similar to the ending of The World is Not Enough (aka Bond 19) where the hero finds himself in a bit of a jam, finds a spear-like piece of metal, and impales the bad guy. The end. No cleverness, but mostly luck. Had that piece of metal not been there, the good guy would likely have died (but, lucky for him, it was just within reach).

The visual effects were very good throughout. As with most of the recent Star Trek flicks, all the ships were pure CG. And, though lighting is one of the most difficult aspects of computer generated effects (the human eye can spot lighting mistakes easily), the lighting was excellent and matched the non-CG elements well.

Ah, on to the particle effects. As you recall, the Enterprise is rammed into the Shinzon’s ship. As it makes impact, the Enterprise splinters apart and its shards break off into space. The effects crew could have chosen to do this over-dramatically, but the disintegration was almost tastefull (if that can be said of a such an event).

(End of spoilers.)

Wil Wheaton appears (as Wesley) in a non-speaking role, but his role was originally much larger. In the editing process, his role was cut away (Wil talkes about this on his blog). There were some scenes that could have been cut (to make room for Wil), including a hokey fight that Riker has (it doens’t advance the story much). With any luck, perhaps some of Wil’s scenes will make it onto the DVD.

In all, I had a good time, though I would probably only recommend this to people who are already Trek-fans. To be sure, it was good enough to see once, though I don’t think I’ll be buying the DVD (though if Wil’s scenes make it to the DVD, perhaps I’ll borrow it from someone to watch once through).