More on Red Hat and KDE

There seems to be some confusion surrounding Red Hat and whether they (intentionally or unintentionally) mangled their KDE.

Mike’s Little Website” has A Users’ Perspective of Red Hat 8.0’s KDE. Now, I’m not pro Red Hat, per se, but I think they have had some rough treatment regarding what may have been due to recompiling some apps with GCC 3. Sure, that may break a few things, but it’s not sabotage.

It’s been alleged that Red Hat deliberately broke Konqueror plugins. […] Konqueror plugins work. On my current 8 BETA system, my favorite Flash site (www.xdude.com) works, my favorite Quicktime site (www.quicktime.com/trailers) works, and so do most other sites (macromedia.com still has issues though). The issue was that older versions of these closed source plugins were compiled with ‘ancient’ (according to Bero) compilers, and this couldn’t be dynamically loaded from the GCC 3 compiled nspluginviewer. Macromedia seem to have fixed the problem with their current Flash 6 open beta […]

Mandrake 9.0 Review

From Slashdot, I was pleased to find this review of Mandrake 9.0. It wasn’t as positive as I thought it might be, though:

[…] Mandrake is using pretty much the default themes and colors of KDE 3.0.3, which looks dated and ugly at best. Even the default Gnome2 looks better than the default KDE. MandrakeSoft should realize that their two main competitors have made strides in making their desktops more delightful and nicer to the eye and the usability (while RH and SuSE are not even trying to compete to the desktop as straightful as MandrakeSoft is), while Mandrake is still the same old, same old. I had to change a lot of things to my desktop to make it look something that can moderately please me. The fact that you can change a lot of KDE’s aspects with some downloads is not the answer. Mandrake should have worked on the looks and the UI. I wonder if they do employ a UI designer, and if they do, if their developers actually listen to him/her.

MandrakeSoft replied to me that their customer research showed that businesses favor their default grey-ish UI, while home users customize everything on their own. Personally, I find hard to believe that businesses would not favor a better UI, while the home users won't have to tweak everything after installation. […]

That’s not to say that Mandrake 9.0 is a bad distiribution, but I really value Eugenia Loli-Queru’s opinion. She did a great review of KDE 3 (from a UI standpoint), and I consider her UI intuition to be on par with Anand’s hardware intuition ;).

She also recently reviewed Red Hat 8.0, which she seemed to like a bit better:

As always, the default environment for Red Hat is Gnome. I haven’t seen any Gnome version numbers anywhere, but I think that RH comes with a modified Gnome 2.0.2. It looks pretty slick, and the fonts (default font is “Sans”) are looking sharp, even being fully antialised, but personally I found them a bit too big for my taste (and I am currently running on 1920x1200 resolution). There is this new feature coming with RH8 that you create a directory called ~/.fonts and you throw in all your TTF fonts in there, and they get recognized automatically from the system! This is pretty neat, only problem is that not many people know about this feature. […]

For me, the killer feature of Red Hat 8.0 is its antialiased fonts (thanks to Xft2). As far as I know, Red Hat 8.0 is the only major distribution to come with XFt2 out-of-the-box. And, that makes it quite tempting to me.

On the other hand, Mandrake is very solid overall, and it’s sure to include Xft2 in its next point-release. So, maybe I’ll wait a bit for that. Really, it all depends on how soon I get my new PC built (which is going rather slowly with my current income).

Fonts in Red Hat’s “Null” release

Red Hat is preparing the next version of its distribution, code-named Null. They’re working on unifying the look, to an extent, between KDE and Gnome (and I have no problem with that).

However, the big news for me came in the form of these KDE screenshots from the Null beta: the fonts look amazing. For instance, the fonts in this menu screenshot look almost OSX-good to the naked eye :).

Whether it’s KDE, a Red Hat configuration, or something else, I’m not sure which software is responsible for those fonts looking so good — but I would be very interested in trying a distribution that could do fonts like that.

(See also this Slashdot story on Red Hat’s upcoming release)