Ballmer ’fesses up to Linux/Windows cost FUD

From The Register, “Ballmer ’fesses up to Linux/Windows cost FUD”. For quite some time, Microsoft maintainted that Linux costed more than Windows. But, they’ve apparently realized that people just aren’t buying that anymore:

Windows is a lot more expensive to run than Linux, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has finally confessed. Despite Redmond’s heroic efforts to defeat common knowledge with elaborately-rigged total cost of ownership ‘studies’, innuendo, FUD and outright distortions, the rhetorical power of common experience has become too powerful, even for a marketing behemoth like MS.

According to an article by VARBusiness, Ballmer now concedes that MS execs “haven’t figured out how to be lower-priced than Linux. For us as a company, we’re going through a whole new world of thinking.” [...]

Top 10 Things Wrong With Linux, Today

Via OSNews is this article “Top 10 Things Wrong With Linux, Today”. I know that Jason can relate to #9, for instance:

No common editor which supports “soft wrapping.” By which I mean displaying things wordwrapped, even when it”s one long line. This means you can go back and edit the line and the rest of the paragraph will reformat itself automatically. Evolution’s message editor does this, but that doesn't help me for composing text files (like this one!). Others I’ve tried — Kate, GEdit, and even vi — only support “hard wrapping”, where it inserts a newline when you get to the end of the line. [...]

Is that really the case, though? No soft-wrappable text editors for Linux?

#5 makes a good point as well — one that I hadn’t given much thought to until now:

Cleaner redraws. This has long been a complaint of mine in almost every OS and desktop environment: slow or flickery window updates. I have only ever seen one OS do it right, and that's Mac OS X. This isn't a speed issue, really; it’s a how-you-update-the-screen issue. Mac OS X pops a window onto the screen all at once. Presumably it does any drawing that it needs to do on a back buffer and then blits it to the screen when it's all done, just like a video game. [...]

To his credit, the author also links to “Top N Things That Have Been Solved”.

UI Suggestions for KDE 3

Via the WebWord mailing list, I discovered the article “Bringing KDE Closer to Joe User’s Desktop”. It offers many suggestions on improving KDE’s UI, and I found it to be fascinating. For instance:

As for the “Configure Desktop...” itself, it should have been called “Desktop Properties” or “Desktop Settings”. “Configure” is a verb. Configure implies that the user knows how to “configure” something. Believe me, for a Unix newcomer, “configure” is a dreadful verb. It is a scary command. It might sound funny to you, but never underestimate the psychology of the user. UI is all about psychology. It is all about shapes, colors, pictures, words... Picking the right elements each time is the right way of creating a comfortable desktop environment. […]

It reminds me in some ways of this usability report on GNOME by the Sun GNOME Human Computer Interaction staff. And, man, Linux sure is pretty. I’ll have to give that another try once I have lesser things to worry about.