In Good Company — Review

Full disclosure: Grace Hill Media offered bloggers a free screening pass in exchange for writing an entry about In Good Company; I participated in that offer.

I saw In Good Company last night. I’d been seeing commercials for it on TV for weeks and a few ads appeared in my TiVo as well; and, it looked pretty good from those ads. To be honest, you probably already have an opinion about this movie, one way or another. And, if you liked what you saw in the trailers, you’ll like this movie.

One fault of the trailers is that they portray this as a fish-out-of-water story, which is only partially true. In short, 26 year-old Carter Duryea (played by Topher Grace) suddenly becomes the boss of Dan Foreman (played by Dennis Quaid) as he takes on the role of head of advertising at a sports magazine. However, that scenario is only a major plot device for about the first half hour.

Past that, it gets into personal and personnel relationships. In particular, Dan’s daughter Alex (played by Scarlett Johansson) becomes romantically interested in Carter. On top of that, Carter has to adjust to his new position within the company.

Really, I knew what I was getting into when I walked in to the theater — one run through the trailer clearly defines the scope of the film. All the same, this isn’t another paint-by-numbers romantic-dramedy. You may think you know what’s going to happen, but it doesn’t always work out that way.

At one point, I was even hoping for the ever-elusive Accountants Ending. (For those unaware, the “accountants ending” is the prototypical unexpected ending for a fictional work: Two men face off at the end, about to kill one another. Then, one interjects “Do you think we should just become accountants?” to which the other replies “Well, right-o. Let’s do that.”)

I enjoyed the characters and the film as a whole; and I also found the set design notably charming. In the scenes taking place within Dan’s house, the furniture, lamps and bookshelves all seemed authentic to a man of his position in life. The sets within the office-oriented scenes were also good, though I did notice an annoying tendency to use underlighting — such as from podiums and even conference tables — that I couldn’t imagine any actual office having.

Some critics describe a movie's worth in terms of whether it’s worth seeing in the theater, as a rental, or not at all. And, as I was walking out of the theater, I was trying to ask myself that question. I was generally leaning towards “maybe a rental”, but I think I’ll qualify that. If you liked the trailer and you like Topher Grace as an actor, you can’t go wrong with seeing this in the theater — it may not be high literature, but you’ll have a good time.

I do have a few minor gripes about the movie, primary of which is that the director and/or score composer didn’t always trust his audience to “know how to feel”. For the most part, the script could have stood on its own; but, there were times where I’d notice a sappy acoustic guitar piping in as if to say “See? You’re feeling all mushy inside, right?”.

In addition to that, Johansson’s lips looked swollen throughout the flick. I've seen her in other works, notably Lost in Translation, but her lips just seemed to big for her own face here. Really, in her first scene, I thought that the make-up artist had just done a shoddy job — that he/she had not “colored within the lines” when applying Johansson’s lipstick.

Another nit was Carter’s Porsche 911 Carrera. One of the first scenes clearly establishes him buying an automatic — as he drives out of the dealership, the camera cuts to a view of his hand putting the car into “D” or such. However, a running joke throughout the movie is that he can barely drive this car. Now, setting aside the cliche that is the Can’t Drive A Manual joke, the joke isn’t even relevant with an automatic transmission. Driving such a car is just a matter of pressing one’s foot down on the skinny pedal towards the right ;).

Might go See Super Size Me Tomorrow

I seem to be the only one here in Dallas who hasn’t seen Super Size Me yet, but I think I may go see it tomorrow at The Inwood. In case you’ve been living in a cave, Super Size Me is a documentary where one guy ate every meal over the course of 30 days at McDonald’s (all while having doctors monitor his health). You can probably guess what happens to this guy.

Its aggregate score at Metacritic is positive (68) and, in particular, all the critics that I trust liked it. Pete Vonder Haar at Film Threat calls it a “Hilarious and often terrifying look at the effects of fast food on the human body.” And, Stephanie Zacharek over at Salon says that “Super Size Me is exploratory, as opposed to being just numbingly didactic, and that’s what makes it so engaging.”

Perhaps ironically, I'm giving some serious thought to grabbing dinner at Fuddruckers beforehand. It’s been a couple months since I’ve been there and I can’t pass up a good hamburger. If you'd like to join me (for Super Size Me or Fuddruckers), just let me know.

Widescreen Lives!

Slate reports on a new trend in the video-rental industry: widescreen. I’ve watched widescreen videos and DVDs for years, but I never thought that it would catch on with the general public. I really thought that Joe Moviewatcher would remain forever oblivious to the portions of his videos that simply weren’t there.

Apparently, widescreen is now the preferred format for DVDs at Blockbuster these days. The way Slate phrases it, “the chain was conceding what cinephiles had argued for years: that widescreen was the superior way to watch a movie at home, even if it left black bars at the top and bottom of your television screen.” They mention the black bars like it’s a bad thing ;).

I gotta say that I’m completely surprised by this — I figured that Blockbuster was simply content in stocking the film industry’s lowest common denominator. All the same, I don’t think I’ll be renting from Blockbuster anytime soon; I’m boycotting them for their anticompetitive business practices.

They set up revenue sharing agreements with the major movie studios which gave Blockbuster discounts on videos and DVDs in exchange for sending a share of the profits back to the studios. Normally, I’d wouldn’t have much problem with this, but these were exclusive contracts and the smaller mom-n-pop video stores had no choice but to pay the higher prices.

Well, hold on a moment… After doing some research, it appears that Blockbuster has cancelled its revenue sharing agreements. The guy at FilmJerk (from the previous link) isn’t too pleased about this, but I see it as another pleasant surprise in Blockbuster’s favor. First this widescreen news and then the revenue sharing cancellation — perhaps I should stop by Blockbuster more often <g>.

A Fish Called Wanda

John Cleese has been one of my favorite actors for some time now. He’s probably most famous for Monty Python and that’s where I first saw him. All the same, I think I most enjoyed him in Fawlty Towers (a sitcom from the mid 70s).

As I was perusing IMDB one day, I ran into A Fish Called Wanda. As it turns out, not only did John Cleese star in the film but he also wrote and directed it as well. I couldn’t lose! So, I had Mike add it to our Netflix queue and it arrived shortly thereafter.

I ended up watching the film last night. “Wanda” was made in 1988 and I thought of that as a good signn — ’88 seemed like a good year for Cleese. But, the film just wasn’t as funny as I had hoped. Sure, I had read the front-page comments (“Excellent caper comedy with a perfect cast”) but I should have read the “other user comments as well”.

I’m sure that most people find the film really good, but I just didn’t somehow. And, I found myself sharing many of the sentiments from the second-page reviews:

  • “Kevin Kline is almost unbearably irritating, and his character makes no sense (is he really a CIA killer, and if so, would he really be such a dumbo?); Jamie Lee Curtis simply isn’t as sexy or seductive as the film-makers want us to think she is, Michael Palin is wasted in a throwaway one-joke role and Cleese never gets much of a chance to do anything beyond looking bashful and doing his stock-in-trade ‘testy posh bloke’ schtick. […] ”

  • “Also Kevin Kline is too good as sadistic maniac Otto. If this was a Monty Python movie, Otto would be such an outragiously exaggerated character, that it would be at least a little bit funny. But Kline acts so naturally that you just hate the guy throughout the movie. […] ”

Those reviews pinpoint how I feel — Kline’s character was too mean to be funny, Palin’s stuttering isn’t even funny the first time, and Cleese’s character is more bumbling than humorous. Then again, maybe it’s just me. All the same, I don’t feel too bad for giving it a chance — with Netflix, it costs the same no matter how many movies we rent each month.

Muppets Take Manhattan at The Inwood

I went to the Inwood Theater last night to see Lost In Translation. It’s been out for a while (since September, it would appear) and I was pleasantly surprised that it was still showing. I’ve heard so many good things about it and, until last night, I had figured that I had missed my chance to see it in theaters.

Lost in Translation scored 88 at Metacritic, but that only tells part of it. Of the 43 critics listed, 17 of them gave it a perfect “100” (and 9 more scored it between 90 and 100). More importantly to me, all of the critics I trust rated it highly (Salon, Film Threat’s Stina Chyn and Film Threat’s Rick Kisonak).

The film doesn’t have much of a plot to it (Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson’s characters mostly hang out in Tokyo), but that doesn’t detract from the film. It that sense, it can be a bit like a Seinfeld episode (in a good way), but the film seemed to remind me more of Amélie — each scene worked on its own, but I couldn’t wait for the next one.

In any case, I also noticed on the Inwood’s marquee that they're showing The Muppets Take Manhattan at midnight on Friday and Saturday this weekend. I enjoy the Muppets and I think I’ll go see that. One IMDB reviewer calls TMTM “The Best of the Muppet Films”. And, while it is a good film, I think The Great Muppet Caper may still be my personal favorite.